As political open spaces go, the garden behind 10 Downing Street must currently one of the most infamous. Access is extremely limited, of course, but the number of images on the internet does make a digital visit remarkably easy.

Gardens are powerful allegories and have always played a role in politics and the search for influence and control.  What does this one in London SW1A tell us?

Originally, the garden had power stamped all over it.  But prior to becoming the haunt of our political leaders, Sir Anthony Seldon’s history of Downing Street suggests a more modest inauguration. (https://www.gov.uk/government/history/10-downing-street).  Apparently the Romans created their Londinium settlement on Thorney Island, a marshy piece of land in an area now called Westminster.  No one made much of a go of the new community and Seldon suggests it was ‘prone to plague and its inhabitants were very poor’. 

But lo, a series of kings arrived (Canute, Edward the Confessor and William I), and a great abbey was built.  Government and the Church had arrived, and this section of Thames-side was now ‘on the map’. 

Seldon also reports that the first building known to be on the Downing Street site was the medieval Axe Brewery.  What glorious irony.   

From Van der Wyngarde’s View of London, 16th Century, British Library

Remnant walls have been discovered embedded in the dining room of No 10 and in the garden.  (https://londongardenstrust.org/conservation/inventory/site-record/?ID=WST027a).  With this shift of royal influence to Whitehall, domestic residences were soon being constructed around the Park and the Palace, for those wishing to live close to the power source. 

In 1682, one George Downing obtained the lease and engaged Christopher Wren to build a cul-de-sac of terrace houses.  Seldon comments, ‘It is unfortunate that he [Downing] was such an unpleasant man. Able as a diplomat and a government administrator, he was miserly and at times brutal.’  Seldon continues, ‘In order to maximise profit, the houses were cheaply built, with poor foundations for the boggy ground. Instead of neat brick façades, they had mortar lines drawn on to give the appearance of evenly spaced bricks. In the 20th Century, Prime Minister Winston Churchill wrote that Number 10 was: “Shaky and lightly built by the profiteering contractor whose name they bear”’.  You just couldn’t make it up.

And here comes the exciting bit.  Thanks to the London Gardens Trust, we can report a first mention of a Downing Street garden: ‘a piece of garden ground scituate in his Majestys park of St. James's, & belonging & adjoining to the house now inhabited by the Right Honourable the Chancellour of his Majestys Exchequer’.  https://londongardenstrust.org/inventory/picture.php?id=WST027a&type=sitepics&no=1 Even more exciting, there is a picture, painted by one George Lambert at around the time of Walpole’s residency. 

© Museum of London

As you can see, the image depicts the formal, rectilinear, controlled expanse of a fashionable, early 18th century garden.  Two be-wigged gentlemen stand amongst straight lines – railings, paths, steps, lawns, trees – all backed by a substantial brick wall which clearly separates politics from St James’s Park.  The only light relief as a classical looking statue, set into the wall, and a small black dog.  This is a garden in corsets; the rolling English Landscape tradition has yet to happen and 20th century domestic gardens are not even a twinkle in anybody’s eye.   

From then on, the houses on Downing Street were constantly remodelled, joined together, improved and extended, a process which continues today. 

Extract from ‘A New Pocket Plan of the Cities of London and Westminster 1797’ British Library

But what about the gardens?  Looking at the Google image below, there have been radical changes. The Downing Street grounds have been cut off from St James’s Park and have, to some extent, embraced informality.  The whole area behind house numbers 9 - 12 Downing Street has been combined into a single unit of about a quarter of a hectare.  Earl Mountbatten has his own space, overlooking the Park.

This back garden is no longer a statement of power and influence in its own right but a utility which has been forced to cater for a multitude of functions.  These functions include the garden as play area for young families (Blairs, Browns, Camerons, Johnsons), as a place to grow vegetables (Michelle Obama’s influence on Sarah Brown), a setting for important visitors (including the Barak Obama/Cameron barbeque for military personnel), as stage for state visits and formal events, asan occasional venue for London Square Open Gardens Weekend, as a resource for the increasing numbers who work there and, now, as a Covid facility for fresh air, meetings, explanations, apologies, thanks and other forms of showing appreciation to the in-house team.    

As a result, it is appears that the garden has a bit of everything except a cohesive design.  From recent internet images, we have spotted a mix of small trees, large shrubs, whole shrubberies, herbaceous planting, perennial planting, bedding plants, hedges, bulbs in beds, bulbs in grass, raised beds, urns, yards of Wisteria, mounds of roses, lots of close mown lawns, assorted path surfaces and two ghastly municipal style lighting bollards.  Oh and a huge terrace for, err, sitting out on.   

View from Horse Guards Road of the ‘borrowed plane trees’ and the back of 12 Downing Street Google Imagery © 2022

It’s all maintained by the Royal Parks. Do look at this YouTube video (https://youtu.be/RMwL3GYtqjo) to get a real taste of what it takes to keep the space immaculate for any ocasion, with or without warning.  

What does this horticultural jumble tell us?  I would suggest:

A lack of respect for open spaces; you can take a virtual tour of the inside of 10 Downing Street (https://artsandculture.google.com/u/0/story/twXxuEIPr4FZJA) but not of the garden. 

A failure to demonstrate good design. 

An own goal for lack of sustainable management and biodiversity.

A lost opportunity for British horticulture.  

A return to a good old fashioned head gardener.

Are we too harsh?